usdemocrats.com political news ticker/weblog back to weblog index Grab this swicki from eurekster.com Saturday February 21, 2009 make sure to refresh the page to view the most current updates
ticker last updated 15:53 Eastern Time,
Saturday February 21, 2009 |
CNN
Cable TV live feed |
live
chat |
http://www.twitter.com/usdemocrats |
newsticker timeline 15:49 ET Saturday February
21, 2009 |
VIDEO:
President Obama Weekly Address President Obama discusses the economic
stimulus package he signed this week in his weekly address to
the nation. |
VIDEO:
Governors Gather for Winter Meeting This weekend, the Nat'l Governors Association
holds its annual winter conference. This years theme is,
Strengthening the nations infrastructure. Today's
speakers include: Gov. Ed Rendell (D-PA), NGA Chairman; Gov.
Jim Douglas (R-VT), NGA Vice Chairman; and T. Boone Pickens,
BP Capital Management. |
The quickest and broadest tax cut ever from White House.gov Blog Feed #1, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act will start having an impact as soon as a few weeks from now, in the form of the quickest and broadest tax cut in history:
"Because of what we did, 95% of all working families will get a tax cut -- in keeping with a promise I made on the campaign. And Im pleased to announce that this morning, the Treasury Department began directing employers to reduce the amount of taxes withheld from paychecks -- meaning that by April 1st, a typical family will begin taking home at least $65 more every month. Never before in our history has a tax cut taken effect faster or gone to so many hardworking Americans." #2, once the economy has recovered and weve laid the groundwork for a sustainable future, the President is committed to taking on the massive deficits we inherited:
"That work begins on Monday, when I will convene a fiscal summit of independent experts and unions, advocacy groups and members of Congress to discuss how we can cut the trillion-dollar deficit that weve inherited. On Tuesday, I will speak to the nation about our urgent national priorities, and on Thursday, Ill release a budget thats sober in its assessments, honest in its accounting, and that lays out in detail my strategy for investing in what we need, cutting what we dont, and restoring fiscal discipline." SATURDAY, February 21, 2009 THE PRESIDENT: Earlier this week, I signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act -- the most sweeping economic recovery plan in history. Because of this plan, 3.5 million Americans will now go to work doing the work that America needs done. I'm grateful to Congress, governors and mayors across the country, and to all of you whose support made this critical step possible. Because of what we did together, there will now be shovels in the ground, cranes in the air, and workers rebuilding our crumbling roads and bridges, and repairing our faulty levees and dams. Because of what we did, companies -- large and small -- that produce renewable energy can now apply for loan guarantees and tax credits and find ways to grow, instead of laying people off; and families can lower their energy bills by weatherizing their homes. Because of what we did, our children can now graduate from 21st century schools and millions more can do what was unaffordable just last week -- and get their college degree. Because of what we did, lives will be saved and health care costs will be cut with new computerized medical records. Because of what we did, there will now be police on the beat, firefighters on the job, and teachers preparing lesson plans who thought they would not be able to continue pursuing their critical missions. And ensure that all of this is done with an unprecedented level of transparency and accountability, I have assigned a team of managers to make sure that precious tax dollars are invested wisely and well. Because of what we did, 95 percent of all working families will get a tax cut -- in keeping with a promise I made on the campaign. And I'm pleased to announce that this morning, the Treasury Department began directing employers to reduce the amount of taxes withheld from paychecks -- meaning that by April 1st, a typical family will begin taking home at least $65 more every month. Never before in our history has a tax cut taken effect faster or gone to so many hardworking Americans. But as important as it was that I was able to sign this plan into law, it is only a first step on the road to economic recovery. And we can't fail to complete the journey. That will require stemming the spread of foreclosures and falling home values, and doing all we can to help responsible homeowners stay in their homes, which is exactly what the housing plan I announced last week will help us do. It will require stabilizing and repairing our banking system, and getting credit flowing again to families and businesses. It will require reforming the broken regulatory system that made this crisis possible, and recognizing that it's only by setting and enforcing 21st century rules of the road that we can build a thriving economy. And it will require doing all we can to get exploding deficits under control as our economy begins to recover. That work begins on Monday, when I will convene a fiscal summit of independent experts and unions, advocacy groups and members of Congress, to discuss how we can cut the trillion-dollar deficit that we've inherited. On Tuesday, I will speak to the nation about our urgent national priorities. And on Thursday, I'll release a budget that's sober in its assessments, honest in its accounting, and lays out in detail my strategy for investing in what we need, cutting what we don't, and restoring fiscal discipline. No single piece of this broad economic recovery can, by itself, meet the demands that have been placed on us. We can't help people find work or pay their bills unless we unlock credit for families and businesses. We can't solve our housing crisis unless we help people find work so that they can make payments on their homes. We can't produce shared prosperity without firm rules of the road, and we can't generate sustained growth without getting our deficits under control. In short, we cannot successfully address any of our problems without addressing them all. And that is exactly what the strategy we are pursuing is designed to do. None of this will be easy. The road ahead will be long and full of hazards. But I am confident that we, as a people, have the strength and wisdom to carry out this strategy and overcome this crisis. And if we do, our economy -- and our country -- will be better and stronger for it. Thank you. |
Briefing by White House Press Secretary
Robert Gibbs, 2/20/2009 Office of the Press Secretary PRESS BRIEFING BY PRESS SECRETARY ROBERT
GIBBS MR. GIBBS: I don't have any announcements. Obviously we'll have a week ahead if through the process of playing Jeopardy with you guys doesn't give everything out before we do that. I'll start with you, Ms. Loven. Q Thanks. I would like to ask about the markets. How concerned are you all at how they're reacting to what's being done this week and the afternoon markets? And is the President doing anything, does he have anything different on his schedule or his agenda because of it? MR. GIBBS: Well, obviously he met with a fairly big group of advisors to have his Presidential Daily Briefing on the economy. And the economic situation certainly continues to be at the forefront of his actions. But as I've said a couple -- more than a couple of times, actually, up here, which is I think it is unwise to believe that either everything we do is designed to cause an immediate market reaction or that the score should be kept by that. I think that if you look at the news of the week I think the market probably prices in not just -- probably prices in a lot of information whether it's price increases, whether it's I think a lot of news throughout the globe about a deteriorating economy. I think it's more likely that what you're seeing is what the President continues to talk about, some of our greatest challenges, but certainly not just a reaction to what we're doing. Q Well, let me just ask it in a different way. I understand what you're saying about not wanting to sort of have a daily scorecard that's only kept by what Wall Street does. But at some point you want that to take -- as well as other indicators and for the economy to turn around. What is the President being told by his advisors about when there might be some sort of turning point on some level or another, whether it's markets or somewhere else? MR. GIBBS: Well, again, as I've said before, I think we all recognize and I think forecasters recognize that the downturn in the economy is very serious, very analogous to some of the past deep recessions that we've seen, and that it's going to take some time to get out of that hole. The question is whether that hole gets deeper or how much deeper that hole might get. We believe -- obviously, the President signed into law the Recovery and Reinvestment Plan, which was a good first step in cushioning the blow of the recession and working aggressively to put people back to work. But I've also said from up here any number of times there's not just one thing that we need to or can focus on. You've got financial stability, you've got home foreclosures, you've got reregulation. There's any number of things that the President continues to work on that have to be solved, and it's going to take quite some time to do it. When that turnaround happens, it's hard for me to say. The President and his team believe that the actions that we're taking now will have a direct impact on making that happen quicker. The investments that we make, that you saw the President sign into law earlier this week, we think will have an impact -- a home foreclosure plan that will stem the rising tide and spread of home foreclosures, which is tremendously important; and then obviously working on both financial stability and regulatory reform to ensure that this doesn't happen again. But we've got -- I think the President would be frank and forthright in telling you that we've got a long way to go. He's certainly said that and that's what he's going to continue to work on. Q Bank of America and Citigroup shares are being pummeled today on Wall Street because of fears they're going to be nationalized. Can you assure people that that step is not going to be taken and be avoided? And also, separately, on the automakers, you've had a couple of days to review their plans. Is there any early read you can give, and can you talk about the meeting at Treasury today? MR. GIBBS: I believe the meeting is over at Treasury, and I will attempt to get something for you all on that, based on that ending -- and we've talked a little bit about that this week. Let me reassure as best I can on your first question on banks, this administration continues to strongly believe that a privately-held banking system is the correct way to go, ensuring that they are regulated sufficiently by this government. That's been our belief for quite some time and we continue to have that. Q Robert, the President this morning spoke to the mayors about accountability, making sure you're spending taxpayer money wisely, it's getting to the people who need it. He's also spoken out about corporate leaders taking corporate jets and spending money unwisely. Does he have similar concerns about lawmakers in Congress, since they're off this week, flying around? A lot of stories about Speaker Pelosi in Italy and several other countries; Republican lawmakers flying around the world, as well. Should the Congress, at a time of crisis, be cutting back, as well, and not flying around the world on Air Force jets? MR. GIBBS: Well, I mean, let me split your question a little bit. I'll address the -- I mean, obviously I think members of Congress going overseas on important trips is something that the President did when he was a senator, going several times with -- or once with Senator Lugar and a longer trip to Africa because of the importance of it -- the continent played in our security concerns. So obviously I think they are -- many of those trips are important. I think what you saw the President do today was reiterate what we have said throughout this process, which is -- and there were stories about this even today -- that we have -- we've been entrusted with the taxpayer money and appropriate it in a way in which the President and his team, and Democrats and Republicans, think will best move this economy forward. We understand that that level of trust is extraordinary, and that whether this money goes to the states through a formula grant, whether it goes to the states or local entities through a transportation grant or something like that, that great care has to be used when dealing with the taxpayer money. The money should not be spent on wasteful projects or pet projects, but instead spent on projects that we know can and will move this economy forward. Let me -- you didn't ask me this, but I'll add it anyway. It has been amusing this week to read the many press releases and Twitter comments on those that found the stimulus on C-SPAN during the vote something that they didn't necessarily think was a good idea until it came time to break ground on projects in their home district. Q Are you talking about Republican lawmakers, specifically? MR. GIBBS: Many of them, yes. Q So does the President believe there's some hypocrisy going on? MR. GIBBS: As I've said before, old habits are hard to break. And I think that the American people readily understand when this town gets dominated by games-playing rather than problem-solving. Q Let me follow up. The first week in office the President signed the executive order to close down the military prison camp at Guantanamo Bay. The Attorney General is going on Monday for the first time to get a close look at it. This is a very serious issue. The American people want to know about where are these detainees going to go. And my understanding is the Attorney General is not bringing any media, it's completely closed press. How does that square with the President's vows that we've talked about on transparency? When the American people are wondering how is this policy going to be implemented, the chief law enforcement officer is basically operating in secrecy. MR. GIBBS: I don't think the chief law enforcement officer is operating in secrecy -- Q Well, why isn't he bringing in a camera? MR. GIBBS: Well, I think what this administration is working to do, per the executive order, is to come up with a plan that ensures our security and does so in a way that meets the test of our values and protecting the men and women that keep this country free and safe. I don't think you have to do all of that through a photo op. I think this is a working trip; that this is -- a very serious number of decisions lay in front of this government, and it's important for -- whether it's the counsel here or the Attorney General or any other member of this administration working to find some of those very tough solutions -- to be able to do so not as a photo op, but as something that's -- Q Well, the question is -- it doesn't have to be a photo op if he doesn't want it to be a photo op. If he wants it to be substantive, why not let the American people in on these deliberations? MR. GIBBS: Well, we are letting the American people in on these deliberations. That's why there's a review process that's -- that's ongoing. I think the Attorney General feels comfortable that he can make those decisions without cable. Jake. Q A quick follow-up on Ed's question on the trip to Guantanamo. Can you just give us any sort of timeline for the decision about Guantanamo? You have Greg Craig there now, Eric Holder going down there next week. Is there any sort of timeline you have for the decision and when -- MR. GIBBS: I thought the -- I'll go back and check the executive order. I thought the whole process was 180 days, but I will -- I'll go back and -- Q This is on the 180th day, an announcement will be made? MR. GIBBS: No, no, no -- I assume when they get done and have made those decisions. I think obviously we're in probably the 20-some-odd day. So I don't expect -- I don't -- certainly don't have any announcements today, but as we obviously get closer and make those determinations, we'll have them for you. Q And we did -- we interviewed Gavin Newsom, the mayor of San Francisco, after his meeting. We were talking about the report, the "ready to go" report that the U.S. Conference of Mayors had put out. And Mayor Newsom said, "What came out of the U.S. Conference of Mayors was easily mocked -- not all of it -- but just enough that it put the whole stimulus in peril, for a moment at least." I noticed in the stimulus package it says that money cannot be spent on things like golf courses, casinos, even parks. And I'm wondering, how did the President receive that U.S. Conference of Mayors report? And did that play any role in his threat to the mayors today that if they don't spend the taxpayers' money wisely, he will call them out publicly? MR. GIBBS: Well, I think -- I honestly don't know what his reaction was when he saw the initial report. I know he's met with the mayors on several occasions. But, you know, Jake, he'll have the very same message for the governors on Monday. He has the same message for -- as you saw in the remarks, for the agencies that have to implement these spending programs, and that is that these -- if you're seeking to simply fund a personal agenda at the expense of creating jobs and using taxpayer money to do it, the President will call that out and stop it. That's true for agencies and members of this administration; that's true for governors; that's true for mayors; that's true for anybody that might take part in any amount of this funding. The President, throughout this process, has talked about the need for strict accountability to ensure that the precious resources that the American people have entrusted in this government are spent completely aboveboard and wisely. So I don't think you should look at the message that he delivered today as a one-time message. We'll have more announcements on this next week, and we'll have more dialogue like this next week, whether it's governors or whether it's people within this administration that are entrusted to handle this money. Q On the foreclosure plan, aside from Rush Limbaugh and that cable rant on the floor of the Exchange, there really does appear to be some -- MR. GIBBS: Chuck's network? (Laughter.) Q -- there really does appear to be some anger out there from people who just don't believe the President when he said that only people who acted responsibly are going to be helped here. How can you assure people that you're going to reward only people, only homeowners who acted responsibly? MR. GIBBS: Well, let's go through this, because I do think this is very important. And I've watched Mr. Santelli on cable the past 24 hours or so. I'm not entirely sure where Mr. Santelli lives, or in what house he lives, but the American people are struggling every day to meet their mortgage, stay in their job, pay their bills, to send their kids to school, and to hope that they don't get sick or that somebody they care for gets sick and sends them into bankruptcy. I think we said a few months ago the adage that if it was good for a derivatives trader that it was good for Main Street. I think the verdict is in on that. Here's what this plan will do: For the very first time, this plan helps those who have acted responsibly, played by the rules, and made their mortgage payments. This will help people who aren't in trouble yet keep from getting in trouble. You can't stay in this program unless you continue to make mortgage payments. That's important for Mr. Santelli and millions of Americans to understand. Here's what this plan won't do: It won't help somebody trying to flip a house. It won't bail out an investor looking to make a quick buck. It won't help speculators that were betting on a risky market. And it is not going to help a lender who knowingly made a bad loan. And it is not going to help -- as the President said in Phoenix, it is not going to help somebody who has long ago known they were in a house they couldn't afford. That's why the President was very clear in saying this was not going to stop every person's home from being foreclosed. But Mr. Santelli has argued, I think quite wrongly, that this plan won't help everyone. This plan will help, by the money that's invested in Freddie and Fannie -- will drive down mortgage rates for millions of Americans. The President in his speech was very clear in saying that every American with a mortgage payment should call their lender and see if they can refinance right now. This plan helps people that have been playing by the rules but can't get refinancing, get that refinancing so their home doesn't become foreclosed on. And Mr. Santelli might also know that if you live in a home that's near one that's been foreclosed, your home value has likely dropped about 9 percent, which for the average home is about $20,000. Now, every day when I come out here, I spend a little time reading, studying on the issues, asking people who are smarter than I am questions about those issues. I would encourage him to read the President's plan and understand that it will help millions of people, many of whom he knows. I'd be more than happy to have him come here and read it. I'd be happy to buy him a cup of coffee -- decaf. (Laughter.) Chuck. Q I want to sort of follow up on the criticism that -- MR. GIBBS: Let me do this, too. This is a copy of the President's home affordability plan. It's available on the White House web site, and I would encourage him: download it, hit print, and begin to read it. Q The criticism that's coming on the housing plan is similar to the criticism that came on the bank bailout vote before you came into office and in Phase II, which is there are people who were irresponsible who will be helped -- period. It's going -- that is a fact, that is going to be -- that is going to be -- people are going to use that to say this is not fair. So what do you -- how do you -- you know, how do you justify that? I mean, how do you -- MR. GIBBS: Well, look, there is -- there will be people that made bad decisions that, in some ways, will get help. This plan, though, I think it's important for the American people to understand, was designed to help those that have been responsible. As the President has said, if your neighbor's house is on fire or if several houses are on fire, you don't debate it; you get a hose and try to put the fire out. That's what's most important. This plan will stop the spread of those foreclosures because it addresses those that are -- that potentially could be in trouble but aren't there yet, get the help they need so that the foreclosure sign doesn't go up on their front yard. But I also think it's tremendously important that for people who rant on cable television to be responsible and understand what it is they're talking about. I feel assured that Mr. Santelli doesn't know what he's talking about. Q On the -- going to Jennifer's question on the markets, the markets are the ultimate confidence indicator, in many ways, right? You have said before you're not going to pay attention to day-to-day movements in the markets. However, we might hit a 12-year low by the end of today. And it's -- what is it -- is it the President's responsibility to help create some confidence in the markets? MR. GIBBS: Oh, absolutely. I don't think that -- I mean, I think the President would agree with that wholeheartedly. But again, I think -- Q So this is not -- aren't the markets saying they don't have confidence? MR. GIBBS: Well, again, I think the -- I think -- obviously I'm not on Wall Street, but I think it is not -- I think it is very safe to assume that what is being priced into the day-to-day fluctuations of the market is not just what happens or is announced at the White House or on the road by the White House. You know, again, you know, without going through it, I think you can look at economic news that built up over the past weekend, that we've seen and read about globally, in Europe, in Eastern Europe, in particular, that the economy is deteriorating, in some places more rapidly than might have first been imagined. Q Are you guys considering pulling some triggers here in the government -- MR. GIBBS: Well, I think the President -- Q -- that could give even an artificial boost? MR. GIBBS: Well, I used this example the other day on the plane, and it's helpful -- it's not -- I want to go back and try to more fully answer the question. But understand that, you know, the day that the TARP funding passed, the market went up a thousand points, right? I don't think we'd all together look back and think that was the greatest thing we ever did for financial stability, right? So I think when you -- but, leaving aside that example, I do think that the -- that this administration is working -- whether it's in foreclosures, stability, recovery -- to do that. I think without, again, divining what it is the market is doing or why it is making those decisions, I think that it -- we have to do more and the President understands that. I think he'll begin to talk more about that. He did some today, he'll do some tomorrow, and certainly next week leading into the address, to discuss the number of things that we have that are challenges that we face. Again, you know, it would be nice to be able to just deal with one, get a recovery plan passed, and work on that, but there are probably three or four parallel tracks that have to -- that have to be followed up simultaneously, which is challenging. Jonathan. Q Next week the budget comes out, and it's coming out amid what looks like will probably be the longest recession since World War II. How has the economic crisis impacted the President's ability to do some of the things that he promised to do on the campaign trail? And can you say right now that there will be no tax increases in 2010? MR. GIBBS: Well, let me do this. Let me -- we'll have more to say on the budget soon, and I'm not going to get ahead of what the President will say on Tuesday or what is ultimately contained in the budget on -- I think will be released on Thursday. I will say this, and I think this is apparent in any number of things, that the President strongly believes that as we have spent money in the short term for the recovery plan, that we have an unsustainable path long term in our budgets. Some of the actions that we are going to take that are out there are some honesty in budgeting, that give people a fuller picture of what's going on -- putting the -- some of the war spending back on budget; putting some disaster spending back on budget; and understanding that what that will show you on Thursday is a deficit far bigger and far redder than what might have first been imagined, because for many years we've used tricks and gimmicks to mask the size of our irresponsibility. But I think what you'll hear from the President on Tuesday is a discussion about the decisions that we are going to have to make collectively to get ourselves back on a path toward some sustainable fiscal track. Q And I asked you last night and you didn't have an answer -- what does the President want to get out of this fiscal responsibility summit? MR. GIBBS: I've got a little bit on that in the week ahead, so let me wait on that one. Yes, sir. Q Back on the bank nationalization question. It sounded to me by your answer that you weren't quite ruling it out, you were just saying that the President strongly prefers not to do it. Is that correct? MR. GIBBS: No, no, no. Let me be clear: The President believes that the bank -- a privately held banking system regulated by the government is what this country should have. Q "Should have," but does that mean he will not nationalize banks? MR. GIBBS: It's hard for me to be clearer than where I just was. Q Okay. And also, does the President agree with a statement by Attorney General Holder the other day that on things racial, we are essentially a nation of cowards? MR. GIBBS: I have not talked to the President about that. I think what the Attorney General discussed was -- or talked about was that for many years in this country all races have struggled with discussions about race. I would point you to the President's speech on the topic during the campaign as his thoughts on that matter. Q And, Robert, you said you could never be -- you couldn't be clearer than that. You could say he will never nationalize a bank; that would be clearer. Can you say that? MR. GIBBS: Well, I think I was very clear about the system that this country has and will continue to have. Q Robert. MR. GIBBS: Yes. Q Back to the auto talks. The President didn't attend the session today, as I understand it. MR. GIBBS: He did not. Q Will he be attending future sessions? And what's the road map for the next Auto Task Force meeting? Will they meet a couple times a week? MR. GIBBS: I will -- let me check on the long-term schedule. I do anticipate that at some point the President obviously will join in on those discussions, and obviously in going through these plans and ultimately what's decided on how the industry has to be restructured. Q And is he -- is the task force encouraging Detroit to very strongly consider mergers of any kind? Are they giving that kind of advice? MR. GIBBS: Let me -- I will try to get as best a readout as I can. Like I said, I was not in that meeting. Q Robert. MR. GIBBS: Yes, Major. Q U.N. officials acknowledged yesterday that they believe that Iran has developed enough enriched uranium for one nuclear weapon. What is the administration's reaction to that? And what are implications for this as he puts together this plan of engaging Iran? MR. GIBBS: Well, Major, I think that the report represents another lost opportunity for Iran as it continues to renege on its international obligations. Absent compliance, the international community cannot have confidence that this program is exclusively of a peaceful nature. It does underscore the urgency with which the international community must work together to address these enrichment activities. The review of our policy continues. But -- Q Does it slow it down or change its trajectory in any way? MR. GIBBS: I don't believe it does. I think that this White House understands that working with our allies that this is an urgent problem that has to be addressed, and that we can't delay addressing. Q On autos, the President said yesterday in Ottawa that the auto companies will have to go through "significant restructuring" -- those were his two words. Is there any way that that can be achieved, based on what the task force has seen so far, absent bankruptcy? MR. GIBBS: Well, again, let me get a readout from what they've seen and what they discussed today. Q Lastly, will there ever be a time in the administration when the stock market will be a barometer for the President's economic success? (Laughter.) MR. GIBBS: Depends. (Laughter.) Q Robert -- MR. GIBBS: Hold on, I'll get there. Yes, sir. Q Robert, you all have promised that the President would make a speech in a Muslim nation within the first 100 days. Are you going to keep that promise? And on a more parochial and local issue, does the -- will the President's limousines bear the "Taxation Without Representation" license plates that Bill Clinton's limousines once did and that George Bush's did not? MR. GIBBS: I confess I don't have the slightest idea what the license plates on the limousine say now, but I can certainly check on that. In terms of the speech, we're moving forward with that, and -- but for any number of reasons, I just can't get into those details right now. Q Does that mean that you all still intend -- MR. GIBBS: We're moving forward with that, yes. Sheryl. Q Robert, looking ahead to the budget, and also to Tuesday's address, how much will the President use each of these two occasions to lay out very specific agendas for some of his initiatives going forward, particularly energy and health care? You were criticized in rolling out the bank bailout plan, that lacked specifics. Will we hear, you know, a comprehensive proposal on these -- MR. GIBBS: Well, I think you've covered Congress long enough to know that it's hard to lay out a budget and not be fairly detailed and comprehensive. I think people will definitely know that the President is taking swift action to invest in renewable energy and ensure that we reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and that we're taking steps to make health care more affordable for millions of Americans, while providing those that don't have health insurance with access. Q There's been negotiations going on on the Hill with Senator Kennedy to try to come to agreement on some kind of universal access plan. How much has the President been involved in these discussions? And is he willing to defer such a big piece of his agenda to negotiations that are ongoing outside of the White House? MR. GIBBS: Well, I don't know the degree to which we've been involved. I think it's a safe bet that anything that goes -- anything dealing with health care is going to go through Senator Kennedy, Senator Kennedy's committee. I think it has to be talked about with many of the stakeholders that are listed in that article. I don't think that we believe that those representing doctors and patients and hospitals and insurance companies and legislators all discussing a path forward on affordable health care is a bad thing. I think just the opposite. We think that's -- it's a good step in the right direction. It's going to take some time, and we're glad that they've started. Yes, sir. Q Robert, can I ask about gas taxes versus miles driven taxes? MR. GIBBS: Sure. Q Secretary LaHood told AP in an interview that he thinks we should look at this, going to miles driven taxes. But someone -- a spokesman over at the department said, no, that it is not and will not be administration policy. Which is it? And has the President weighed in on this? MR. GIBBS: I don't believe the President has. I can weigh in on it and say that it is not and will not be the policy of the Obama administration. Q So was Secretary LaHood speaking out of turn here? MR. GIBBS: I would direct you to Secretary LaHood on that. Q Well, we actually interviewed him, so -- MR. GIBBS: Well, call him back. (Laughter.) Q What about the kind of rants -- back to a response on the kind of rants that there -- against the stimulus package, does the kind of cable debate, cable broadcast debate over the plan, is that damaging to the President's case for a stimulus, or does it help Americans to have an open debate like that? MR. GIBBS: Well, I don't doubt that an open debate is something that's obviously important. The President used to use the story -- I forget who he quoted -- that people are entitled to their own opinion, not just their own facts. You know, sometimes -- I don't think -- I don't think anybody could sit in front of the TV and listen for an hour and not hear somebody that's making a case that just -- I got to assume they knowing -- they know just isn't true. I think that -- but I think that kind of debate, that -- certainly that debate is helpful. The impact of it all -- I think I said this last week, that if I hadn't worked on the campaign, but simply watched the cable news scorekeeping of the campaign, we lost virtually every day of the race. I mean, how many days did we cover -- through our trip to Europe through election day -- that the Obama campaign was out-quicked or out-smarted, and we covered ads that were seen by the dozen or so people currently watching that program -- (laughter) -- but not by the rest of America. You know, like I said, if I would have just watched cable TV, I long would have crawled into a hole and given up this whole prospect of changing the country. Yes, sir. Q Robert, each time the President talks about the economy, he talks both about the challenges that we face and then usually has a -- sort of an optimistic line about -- that we'll get through this. Can you talk about how he's sort of calibrating that message as he prepares the speech on Tuesday? MR. GIBBS: Well, and I think President Clinton talked about this -- I think the -- and the President certainly has said this for quite some time, that he believes it is very important to be honest with the American people about the struggles and the challenges that we face. We've seen political endeavors in the past that have not been up front with the American people and where they were and the progress or the lack of progress that was being made, and that this President believes it's important that we do that in a forthright and honest way. The President, as you said, also talks about the fact that he understands that if we take and meet those challenges head on, that brighter days are ahead. He said several times last week that he was an eternal optimist. I think he understands that it's important for him to be confident and hopeful in the path that we're taking, but honest about the many challenges that we face. And that's what he's working on doing. Yes. Q Yes, on Iran. Two more on Iran. Is the U.S. trying to convince the Iranian government to change its attitude toward Israel and not to continue its threat to destroy Israel? MR. GIBBS: Absolutely. I mean, I think the President on any number of occasions has said that -- not just with Iran, but with other groups -- that it's -- they have to stop threatening Israel and the Israeli people. Q On this IAEA report, does it preclude the possibility of Iran using a dirty bomb? Does Iran have that capability now? MR. GIBBS: I have not read the full report on that and what that might mean. Q Robert, thank you. A few days ago when you were asked about President Obama's reaction to the Senator Burris controversy, you said, "I have to say, I've neglected to speak with him." Things have escalated since then. Today Governor Quinn has asked for him to step down. By chance, do you have a read of what President Obama thinks should be done in this case? MR. GIBBS: I haven't talked to him specifically about all of this. What I also said was -- during that day, which was that Senator Burris -- well, first of all, that the people of Illinois have been through a very trying time with the Governor. The appointment of Senator Burris was -- and his taking the Senate seat was based largely on the representations that he'd made, factual representations that he'd made to the people of Illinois through interviews and through his testimony to the impeachment committee. We know that -- and has been reported extensively -- that there seemed to be -- some of those stories seem to be at variance with what's happened; that the President is supportive of an investigation that would get some full story out. And I think it might be important for Senator Burris to take some time this weekend to either correct what has been said and certainly think of what lays in his future. Q Robert. MR. GIBBS: April. Q Robert, so going back to this -- Q It sounds like a resignation call. Q It sounds like you're telling him to resign. MR. GIBBS: No, I -- Q Going back to the -- MR. GIBBS: -- just for him to take a look at what has been said and for him to come up with an explanation that satisfies -- Q But is there an explanation that can satisfy? I mean, it's gone from one extreme to the other. MR. GIBBS: Well, that's a question to ask Senator Burris, not Robert Gibbs. Q Wait a minute, wait a minute. You called on me. Hello, Robert. You called on me. MR. GIBBS: I haven't talked to him. Q Okay. But you said he needs -- MR. GIBBS: Hello, April. I answered your questions -- go ahead. I'm in a giving mood today, so fire away. Q Anyway, you said he needs to take time this weekend, though. And, I mean, you -- this White House is, coming through your mouth, basically saying that this man has shaded the facts and he needs -- or changed -- you said he had a variance. So he needs to go back -- MR. GIBBS: Again, I'm not saying that, April. I think it's been covered -- it's been covered in Lynn's paper, which I read. It's been covered in the Tribune; it's been covered in the Associated Press; it's been covered in a number of places that the testimony that he gave seems to be at variance with what's happened. Q So did he lie? MR. GIBBS: That's a question for Mr. Burris. Kirk. Q Just following up on an earlier question, Robert -- thank you. President Clinton's comments today -- was President Obama unhappy or -- that the President seemed to imply that he was too downbeat, and that he said that he ought to be talking about being hopeful and completely convinced we're going to come through this? MR. GIBBS: Well, I think the premise of that question was that the President balances the challenges that we face with the understanding that we're going to get through tough times as we always have in this country. I haven't talked to the President specifically about his reaction to President Clinton's interview. But I think he understands, as I said, that it's important to be straightforward with the American people about those challenges, to underscore the path that we're taking as being one that he feels will get us on a path toward sustained long-term economic growth, and to give people confidence that those steps are being taken. Q Next week is shaping up to be a take-your-medicine kind of week, pretty tough week. It's going to be fairly downbeat, isn't it? MR. GIBBS: I haven't seen anything other than that in the few weeks that I've already been here. (Laughter.) It hasn't been -- I mean, just to address that for a second, Kirk. I mean, I -- look, I -- whether it is unemployment or unemployment claims, or layoffs, or Afghanistan, or energy independence -- I think there are a number of things that we have, for a long time, and the President believes, as a country have neglected and that are important to begin to work on. Not every one of those decisions is going to be easy, and he understands he wasn't elected to make easy decisions. But he also understands, as he spoke about in the inaugural and I think you'll hear him speak about next week, that we all have a special responsibility to do what we can to put this country back on the right track and to see it through, back to prosperous and better days. Let me go quickly through my week-ahead. The President has no public events on Saturday. We will endeavor to get you the radio address at a reasonable hour tonight. Q And the subject, Robert? Q The economy. MR. GIBBS: The economy. (Laughter.) Have you seen the radio address? (Laughter.) Specifically about the recovery plan. On Sunday, the President and the First Lady will welcome the National Governors' Association to the White House for the annual Governors' Dinner. Q What's the entertainment? MR. GIBBS: I believe Earth, Wind and Fire. You just wanted me to say that on camera, didn't you? (Laughter.) Q Can you sing a little -- MR. GIBBS: No, no, no, no, no, no, no. No, I got a tip jar right here and -- Q That's The Way Of The World? MR. GIBBS: Oh, don't tempt me. On Monday morning, the President and the Vice President will meet with Democratic and Republican governors from across the country. During the meeting -- all the governors have been invited. Later that morning and into the afternoon, as Jonathan talked about, the President will -- the President and the Vice President will host the Fiscal Responsibility Summit at the White House and lead a frank discussion on how we can address the long-term fiscal problems facing this country. About 130 people are invited, including Democratic and Republican leadership in Congress, the chairs and ranking members of key committees, and a wide range of community leaders and stakeholders from business, academia, financial and the labor sectors. Q Can we have a list of -- Q Yes, can we get a list? MR. GIBBS: Let me see where that is. The Vice President will open the summit with remarks. Two presentations will follow on the nation's fiscal condition, one by economists and former advisor to Senator McCain, Mark Zandi; and Robert Greenstein, the executive director of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. OMB Director Peter Orszag will introduce the President, who will conclude with some remarks. After these presentations, participants will break out into smaller discussion groups to tackle specific fiscal challenges facing our country, including tax and revenue, health care, Social Security, procurement and the budget process. Each breakout group will be moderated by a senior administration official. The larger group will then reconvene and report to the President on their initial work. The summit is the first step in the process of beginning to lay out how we can bring down the deficit and put our economy back on sound financial footing. It opens a week that will be focused on the attention of many fiscal issues. And as you well know, on Tuesday the President will address a joint session of Congress; on Thursday, provide an overview of the fiscal year 2010 budget. That will be released, and there tentatively is scheduled, though I don't have a location yet, domestic travel on Friday. So hopefully we'll be back at a decent hour. Q And Wednesday? MR. GIBBS: Wednesday, I don't have anything specific, which means we'll be in Washington. All right? No travel on -- Q Stevie Wonder. MR. GIBBS: Oh, that's right, the Gershwin Awards and Stevie Wonder. Thanks, guys. END |
On
the front lines "You're on the front lines," President Obama told a gathering of 85 mayors in the East Room of the White House this morning. |
New
commitment to the Gulf Coast "We must ensure that the failures of the past are never repeated," President Obama said in a statement today, announcing the extension of the Office of the Federal Coordinator for Gulf Coast Rebuilding and his decision to send two cabinet members to the region. |
Time
for All of Us to Step Up HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan explains how the President's housing plan helps responsible Americans struggling to make their mortgage payments every month in this economic crisis. |
Friday, February 20th, 2009 at 10:59 am Office of the Press Secretary _____________________________ http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Amending-Executive-Order-13390/ February 20, 2009 By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 5121-5206), and in order to extend the work of the Coordinator of Federal Support for the Recovery and Rebuilding of the Gulf Coast Region, Executive Order 13390 of November 1, 2005, as amended, is further amended by striking "February 28, 2009" and inserting in lieu thereof "September 30, 2009". BARACK OBAMA THE WHITE HOUSE, |
Obama
Bans Budget Gimmicks "The price of more honest bookkeeping:
A budget that is $2.7 trillion deeper in the red over the next
decade than it would otherwise appear." |
U.S. diplomat to focus on North Korea Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has appointed Stephen W. Bosworth as special representative for North Korea policy, the State Department said Friday. Bosworth will oversee U.S. efforts in the six-party talks to denuclearize the Korean peninsula. In addition to the United States and North and South Korea, China, Japan and Russia are taking part in the talks. Bosworth, who has visited North Korea several times, served as U.S. ambassador to South Korea from 1997 to 2000 and was executive director of the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization from 1995 to 1997, the State Department said. Bosworth will replace Assistant Secretary Christopher Hill, who is expected to become the U.S. ambassador to Iraq. |
Mileage tax out, Transportation Dept. says
In a written statement, the department said, The policy of taxing motorists based on how many miles they have traveled is not and will not be Obama administration policy. The idea which involves tracking drivers through global positioning system (GPS) units in their cars is gaining support in some states as a way of making up for a shortfall in highway funding. Oregon carried out a pilot program and deemed it successful. Speaking to The Associated Press, Transportation
Secretary LaHood, an Illinois Republican, said, We should
look at the vehicular miles program where people are actually
clocked on the number of miles that they traveled. The
remark was part of a discussion about various options to help
make up for the highway funding shortfall on the federal level. |
Stimulus Bill Provides $198 Million for Filipino Veterans from VA News Releases |
Gibbs corrects the record on the Presidents housing plan from White House.gov Blog Feed |
Canadian Minister Cannon to Meet with U.S. Secretary of State in Washington, D.C. from Canada News Centre - General public
|
Obama won't pursue mileage tax, agency says from CNN.com |
Canadian Minister Cannon to Speak About Canada's Foreign Policy from Canada News Centre - Foreign Affairs
and International Trade Canada |
U.S. resumes diplomatic talks with Syria from CNN.com |
VIDEO: Venture helps space startups from CNN.com - Video |
VIDEO: Iran's nuclear capability from CNN.com - Video |
Intel and PepsiCo Remain EPAs Top Partners from Green Power Network EPAs Green Power Partnership works
with more than 1000 partner organizations that are collectively
buying more than 16 billion kWh of green power annually. |
Dow Corning Purchases Renewable Energy for Michigan Headquarters from Green Power Network |
VIDEO: FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein (D) from C-SPAN Recent Video |
Mayors seek piece of stimulus pie from CNN.com |
Report: Gitmo detainees treated humanely from CNN.com |
VIDEO: Obama puts mayors on notice from CNN.com - Video |
Responding to Civilian Suffering in Afghanistan from Woodrow Wilson Center News by wwics@wilsoncenter.org
(wilsoncenter.org) |
Iran Passes Strategic Threshold in Nuclear Production from Woodrow Wilson Center News by wwics@wilsoncenter.org
(wilsoncenter.org) |
Popular
Web Sites from USGS Publications Warehouse U.S. Geological Survey (2009), General Information Publication 84. |
U.S. Says Alarmed By Latest IAEA Report On Iran from Rferl.org |
U.S. Says Expects Allies' Commitment For Afghanistan from Rferl.org |
Bosnian Serbs Told To Pay $42 Million For Burnt Mosques from Rferl.org |
Project Office Managing $422M in Katrina Recapitalization Effort from U.S. Navy News Headline Stories |
Clinton Calls For Stronger China Ties from Rferl.org |
Iraq's Abu Ghraib Prison, Renamed, Reopens from Rferl.org |
from National Technical Reports Library:
97 - Energy |
Solar Resource Characterization; Session: Modeling and Analysis (Presentation) from National Technical Reports Library:
97 - Energy |
Navy Fuel Cell Demonstration Project from National Technical Reports Library:
97 - Energy |
Obama: Let the tax breaks begin rolling from CNN Political Ticker by edhornick |
U.S.-led coalition kills 13 Afghan civilians from CNN.com |
from News Release - U.S. Dept. of Defense
|
Modeling and Analysis Session: Market, Value, and Policy Analysis (Presentation) from National Technical Reports Library:
97 - Energy |
Management Challenges at the Department of Energy from National Technical Reports Library:
97 - Energy |
Envisioning the Solar Program Beyond the Solar America Initiative (SAI) (Presentation) from National Technical Reports Library:
97 - Energy |
EE&RE; Session: CIGS (Presentation) from National Technical Reports Library:
97 - Energy |
Concentrating Solar Program; Session: Thermal Storage - Advanced Fluid Development (Presentation) from National Technical Reports Library:
97 - Energy |
Atmospheric Processing Platform (Presentation) from National Technical Reports Library:
97 - Energy |
Analysis of Indirect Emissions Benefits of Wind, Landfill Gas, and Municipal Solid Waste Generation from National Technical Reports Library:
97 - Energy |
from National Technical Reports Library:
85 - Transportation |
Update of Vehicle Sanction Laws and Their Application: Volume 1. Summary from National Technical Reports Library:
85 - Transportation |
U.S. Motor Vehicle Industry: Federal Financial Assistance and Restructuring from National Technical Reports Library:
85 - Transportation |
Technology Scan for Electronic Toll Collection from National Technical Reports Library:
85 - Transportation |
Synthesis of Research on Value of Time and Value of Reliability from National Technical Reports Library:
85 - Transportation |
Portable Cellular Wireless Mesh Sensor Network for Vehicle Tracking in an Intersection from National Technical Reports Library:
85 - Transportation |
Ocean Piracy and Its Impact on Insurance from National Technical Reports Library:
85 - Transportation |
from National Technical Reports Library:
85 - Transportation |
Measuring the Marginal Cost of Congestion from National Technical Reports Library:
85 - Transportation |
Maritime Security Partnerships from National Technical Reports Library:
85 - Transportation |
from National Technical Reports Library:
85 - Transportation |
Ice Shape Scaling for Aircraft in SLD Conditions from National Technical Reports Library:
85 - Transportation |
Fragility Analysis of Water Supply Systems from National Technical Reports Library:
85 - Transportation |
Forecasting Metropolitan Commercial and Freight Travel, Synthesis 384 from National Technical Reports Library:
85 - Transportation |
Feasibility of Mileage-Based User Fees: Application in Rural/Small Urban Areas of Northeast Texas from National Technical Reports Library:
85 - Transportation |
Engine Damage-Related Propulsion System Malfunctions from National Technical Reports Library:
85 - Transportation |
Economic Competitiveness: Performance Measures for Transportation from National Technical Reports Library:
85 - Transportation |
Development of Archiving and Data Fusion Strategies for Travel Time Data from National Technical Reports Library:
85 - Transportation |
Development of an NTD Tool for Vanpool Services from National Technical Reports Library:
85 - Transportation |
Chrysler Corporation Loan Guarantee Act of 1979: Background, Provisions, and Cost. from National Technical Reports Library:
85 - Transportation |
VIDEO: Can bamboo save the planet? from CNN.com - Video |
Scientists Gain Insight Into Blood Cancer's Progression from healthfinder.gov Daily News |
VIDEO: Washington Journal Entire Program from C-SPAN Recent Video Published: Today at 7am (ET) |
Pakistani Taliban Agree 'Permanent Ceasefire' In Swat from Rferl.org |
Iraq Seeks New Law To Fight Corruption from Rferl.org |
VIDEO: President Obama Weekly Address from C-SPAN Recent Video Published: Today at 10am (ET) |
Clinton in China: Human rights 'cannot interfere' from CNN.com - World |
Army medic gets life in killing of 4 Iraqis from CNN.com - World |
Russia Delays Opening Power Plant In Tajikistan from Rferl.org |
VIDEO: Mayor Jay Williams (I-OH), Mayor of Youngstown from C-SPAN Recent Video Published: Today at 7:30am (ET) |
VIDEO: Dan Hurley, American Assn. of State Colleges, State Relations Director from C-SPAN Recent Video Published: Today at 8:30am (ET) |
Karzai, Pelosi talk counter-terrorism, reconstruction from CNN Political Ticker by edhornick |
New Orleans Parade Honors Returning IA Sailors from U.S. Navy News Headline Stories |
USBP
in the News Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:24:24 -0600 For archived news releases, please visit CBP News Releases located under Newsroom. |
East Africa Forum » Combating
Maritime Piracy http://www.eastafricaforum.net/2009/02/21/combating-maritime-piracy/ |
U.S. Department of State Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:55:46 -0600 Secretary of State Interview With Jill Dougherty of CNN Seoul, South Korea February 20, 2009 http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2009a/02/119427.htm
QUESTION: Madame Secretary, thank you very much for being with us. You know, right now, the U.S. seems to be saying two things to North Korea. One would be, youre a tyrannical, unpredictable country that insults and threatens its neighbors, and your leadership is unclear, as you put it. And then the second thing its saying is youre a country that has the ability to act rationally, make commitments, and follow through on them if it wants to. Now, isnt this a mixed message? And does it mean that the United States really hasnt settled on a policy toward North Korea? SECRETARY CLINTON: No, I dont think so, Jill. I think that the past history proves that North Korea can be either of those depending upon what its attempting to achieve. And what is clear from the Six-Party process over the last years is that when North Korea decides to cooperate and make agreements that it believes are in furtherance of its own interests, it will do so. And when it doesnt, it is always seeking advantage, and it uses provocative words and threatening actions to try to get attention in order to make a deal in some way-- food and fuel and other kinds of assets. I mean, South Korea basically keeps the North Korean economy going with all of the subsidies of food and fuel and medical supplies and the like. So I think its calculated, and I think you have to respond in kind as you look at the behavior of the day, the week, the month, and the year. QUESTION: You know, speaking of taking advantage, right now, you have the theory that with the economic crisis in the world affecting the United States and Asia certainly, youve been talking about that here that the North or perhaps other countries might take advantage of this opportunity to think that the outside world is so engaged with that issue that they can take provocative action. What do you think? SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I think thats an interesting analysis, because clearly, the new Administration has demonstrated, through what the President has said, I have said, and others that there is an opportunity for North Korea to return to the Six-Party Talks, to begin working in a thoughtful way toward the denuclearization in a verifiable and complete manner as it had agreed to. And then all of a sudden, these insults and these provocative statements start coming across the border. Now, if North Korea is calculating that somehow, theyre going to drive a wedge between the United States and the Republic of Korea, theyre badly miscalculating that. Our alliance is stronger than ever. And its not only about our mutual security, but its also about how were going to deal with the global economy and so much else. So I think that theres a testing period and a kind of wait-and-see attitude about how this is going to move forward. And were hoping that North Korea will see its way clear to reengage. And as Ive said repeatedly, if we can get to the point where denuclearization is verifiable and complete, there are tremendous advantages waiting for North Korea not only a bilateral, normal relationship with the United States, but I think a lot of international support and aid that could come to the people of North Korea. QUESTION: The next stop is Beijing. China has not been as directly affected by this financial crisis worldwide as some other countries. And in fact, its going around the world buying up natural resources oil, minerals, et cetera. When this crisis is finally over, could it turn out that China would emerge stronger than it is now with the ability to pose a direct challenge to U.S. interests? SECRETARY CLINTON: You know, Jill, the way that Im looking at China and anticipating our talks there in the next two days is that the rise of China is not in and of itself threatening to the United States. Its how China decides to act with whatever assets it has. But thats up to how we cooperate together. I think that the Chinese economy is incredibly dependent upon the American consumer. That has been the source of a lot of the growth in China. They have 20 million migrant workers who are unemployed as of today. They are having to do their own stimulus package. So how China moves through this economic contraction is not determined yet, just like how were going to move through. Weve got to work together. We have a big stake in seeing the global economy recover. But I have infinite faith in the resilience and dynamism of the American economy, and I think that President Obama has put us on the right track now to be able to recover. So are we going to have competition with China? Of course. You have competition with all kinds of countries. Thats nothing new. But we also hope for cooperation in a peaceful and productive manner on a range of issues where we think that China and the United States have comparable interests, whether it be global climate change, clean energy, the economic challenges we face, and shared security issues like Afghanistan and Pakistan and so much else. QUESTION: And one question about yourself and the job that youve taken on: Youve been in the job as Secretary of State for about a month. Every word, every gesture that you make is under the microscope, including your comments yesterday and today on North Korea and the issue of succession. They have grave, serious implications for U.S. foreign policy. How is this job different from the jobs youve had before senator, first lady and is it more difficult? A person that I know said its like wearing a silk straightjacket. Do you feel that? SECRETARY CLINTON: (Laughter.) I dont feel that way at all, and Ive always believed that you just get up every day and you do the best job you can no matter what it might be. Its a great honor to be representing the United States. I also have a conviction that some open, candid conversation is called for, that there needs to be an exchange of ideas, that something as commonplace as whos going to naturally succeed at whatever time that might be in North Korea thats on peoples minds. Its written about. We ought to be engaging. We ought to elicit reactions and opinions about that and many other issues. So yes, it carries with it a great deal of responsibility, but I see it as a tremendous opportunity to continue to serve my country. QUESTION: So its not a verbal minefield? SECRETARY CLINTON: I think that some people invest way too much in parsing words. I think that you have to look at the complete picture, and I think its very clear what the Obama Administration is attempting to do and what Im attempting to do as Secretary of State. And I also am very deliberately talking about things and trying to open up dialogue and create some space for there to be sensible discussion about the way forward on some very difficult problems. QUESTION: Well, thank you very much, Madame Secretary. SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you. # # #
PRN: 2009/T1-18 |
CIA director promises independent judgment http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gfejtEZxRlMxCQyuwCxCuCRB4xgA |
A new Request for Applications (RFA) has been posted: Accelerating Development of Methods for the Study
of Complex Patients (R21) This information has recently been updated,
and is now
available. |
FDA.GOV CDRH New Update The following new items were added to the CDRH web pages on February 19, 2009. Previous CDRH New Items can be found on the CDRH New Page. |
2/19/2009
- SOC's Final Report Released Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:00:00 -0600 Posted by: S. Ward Casscells, M.D. |
Military
Medical Outreach Coming to Western Alaska Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:00:00 -0600 (News Story) |
Obama: People should see tax cut help
by April 1 http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hEx3tiPJhZQLVqjNmHR_oP6FZMuwD96G21FO2 |
Statistics for the U.S. Department of Labor This information has recently been updated.
View the latest
DOL statistics. |
Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:43:11 -0600 U.S. Department of State Hillary Rodham Clinton Secretary of State Interview With James Rosen of Fox News Seoul, South Korea February 20, 2009 http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2009a/02/119426.htm
QUESTION: Madame Secretary, thank you for this honor. I want to begin by asking how its going in terms of securing me a better seat on the airplane. Are you making any headway with that? SECRETARY CLINTON: You know, James, you all decided on a lottery system. You know, I believe in empowering people to make their own decisions. Thats part of smart power. And so we gave you all the opportunity, and you drew the middle seat. QUESTION: This is very encouraging. SECRETARY CLINTON: Now, next time, Im going to wish for bigger seats for you. QUESTION: Okay. Lets talk about Afghanistan to begin with. At the NATO defense ministers conference, our allies only agreed to contribute an additional 1,400 troops. Thats got to be a disappointingly low figure. SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, we are only at the beginning of that process. Secretary Gates knew that there were some who were ready to commit now, and obviously made the ask. But we are in the midst of our policy review, and I think that a number of countries are waiting to see more specifically what our plan is, why we think that their contribution of troops would be helpful. But also, its important, James, to point out that we want their civilian help as well. We want their help training the Afghan army. We want their help training the Afghan police. So theres going to be a number of ways people can contribute. QUESTION: I want to ask about North Korea. And in doing so, I would like, because youre an attorney, to use a legal term of art. I wish to stipulate in advance that it is the plutonium reprocessing operations in North Korea that are of paramount concern. SECRETARY CLINTON: Yes. QUESTION: However, to the extent that highly enriched uranium programs are of intrinsic concern to American policymakers, I hope that we can discuss it solely on its own merits. SECRETARY CLINTON: Mm-hmm. QUESTION: Ive been following your statements closely and, without parsing words or splitting hairs, taking them quite literally. Your statements on this issue have progressed just in the last few days. At the Senate confirmation hearing, you said it was never quite verified that that program exists. En route to Elmendorf Air Force Base, you said there was a debate within the intelligence community as to the extent of the program. And then yesterday, en route to Seoul, you said that one day you look forward to inspectors being able to determine what, if anything, existed. Now, its one thing to say we dont know if it presently exists. Its another thing to say we dont know the extent of it or how far its progressed. But youre not in any doubt as to whether, quote, if anything existed at any time? You do believe that there was a program at some time? SECRETARY CLINTON: James, I am going to be as clear as I can be about this. I think that there is a sense, among many who have studied this, that there may be some program somewhere, but no one can point to any specific location nor can they point to any specific outcome of whatever might have gone on, if anything did. And I hate to be so parsing, but I think its important to underscore this point again. Do I believe that the North Koreans, if they could engage in producing highly enriched uranium, would attempt to do so? I mean, that seems to be their nuclear ambition. I dont have any doubt that they would try whatever they possibly could. Have they? I dont know that and nobody else does either. And I think whats important is to remember why this debate is still going on. Clearly, there was some reason to believe that something having to do with highly enriched uranium - whether it was happening in North Korea, whether it had been imported into North Korea - was part of the information derived once we got inspectors into North Korea. But I do believe it was an error to tear up the controls we had on the plutonium. Because what we do know for sure is that they went and reprocessed the plutonium. So we do have to work hard to figure out what, if anything, there is about highly enriched uranium, but that should not that debate should not detract from our continuing emphasis about disabling their capacity to reprocess more plutonium. And sometimes those get its like, well, if we cant figure out one and do them both, we shouldnt do the other, and I just dont agree with that. QUESTION: Youve led me to my next question. You have been fairly explicit at various points along the way in this trip in stating that it was a mistake for the Bush administration to jettison the Agreed Framework. And to a Japanese interviewer on this trip, you stated that the Bush administration changed its policy over time, and that you believe that the ending policy was where they should have started out. Yet, when one of my colleagues in the traveling press corps at the Japanese foreign ministry the other day asked you if it was a mistake for the Bush administration to de-list North Korea in the absence of any more tangible concessions from the North, you said, Im not going to get into an analysis of the past. Now, youre clearly content to analyze the past on some occasions, so I think its fair to put the question to you again: Was that a mistake? SECRETARY CLINTON: Im not going to comment on that, because that is part of the process were engaged in right now. So this is still an open effort on our part, to get the North Koreans back to the Six-Party Talks. The role that that decision did play and might play in trying to engage them once again is of paramount concern to me right now. So I guess we could slightly amend what I said. And the immediate past I think, we should, you know, look on going forward. But I do think that we could have gone after the North Koreans based on whatever evidence we had about highly enriched uranium without giving up the control that we had established over the plutonium. QUESTION: I have less than a minute left and I want to pursue a topic of extreme importance to me - you mentioned on an Indonesian television program your love of the Beatles. Two questions number one, are you more partial to the irrepressible melodies and hand-clapping of the Please Please Me era or to the world-weary drug fueled existentialism of their later work? SECRETARY CLINTON: (Laughter.) Well, like so many Beatles fans, it depends both on mood and stage of life. I have to confess, since I am older than you, that the hand-clapping mode was what I first was captured by. I Want to Hold Your Hand was an anthem, as you might imagine. But then as I went through my angst period (laughter) and you know, struggled with the challenges of living in the real world, the more existential message struck home. QUESTION: Do you have a favorite Beatles song? SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, it sort of is on the more existential side. I have always loved Hey Jude. Now, dont ask me why, because thats almost biblical in meaning, as you know. QUESTION: I do know. SECRETARY CLINTON: Yes. And I know that youre a collector -- QUESTION: (Laughter.) SECRETARY CLINTON: -- of memorabilia. And I always have been sort of moved by the range of emotion in the Beatles. But at the end of the day, I think Lennon and McCartney were geniuses, and Im just glad I got to live through that period. QUESTION: I suppose it was too much to expect that the American secretary of state, on her first trip overseas, would advocate on behalf of Revolution. SECRETARY CLINTON: No. In fact, you understand the reasons why that might not be appropriate. (Laughter.) QUESTION: Madame Secretary, thank you. SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you, James. # # #
PRN: 2009/T1-19 |
Chairman Cites Need for More 'Dwell
Time' Between Deployments http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=53164 SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE, Ill., Feb. 20, 2009
- The nation's top military officer expressed concern here yesterday
about servicemembers and their families "toughing it out"
with frequent deployments and little time together between those
deployments. In answer to a question from the audience, Mullen acknowledged that even when troops theoretically have 12 months of "dwell time" between deployments, that's not really the case when they have to spend part of that time away from their families training for their next deployment. "The way the families are handling this thing is they're just toughing it out until they get the relief. There's a concern about how long they can tough it out," he said. "We're going to have to continue to focus on that." Suicide rates are increasing in all of the services -- dramatically in the Army -- Mullen said. "The correlation [between] the stress of these wars and the suicide rate is something that I accept, and then I want somebody to disprove that," he said in pledging continued efforts to fix the problem. "I'm not going to wait for somebody to disprove that to me." Turning to care for the casualties of war, the chairman said the nation owes them and their families a great debt. "For these [servicemembers] who've either paid the ultimate price or been wounded and done what we asked them to do as a country," he said, "we should figure out what their needs are, ... and we should figure out how to take care of them for the rest of their lives." Mullen drew on the Israeli model of veteran care as an example of the intent the United States should have when it comes to veteran care. He noted a past conversation with the Israeli army chief of staff, during which he asked how that country provides continuous care for its wounded. The Israeli chief reached into his wallet and produced a list of a dozen names. Upon assuming command of a unit, he explained, Israeli commanders must sign for an accountability log that lists the families of the unit's fallen servicemembers and the unit's wounded and their families. The commanders take care of and keep in touch with these people, and are inspected on their fulfillment of this obligation as part of their command requirements. "As the [Israeli] minister of defense says, 'We write the check off the top at the beginning of the budget cycle to make sure they're taken care of,'" Mullen said. "I'm not arguing we should do that, but I am saying we ought to have that effect." Later, Mullen spoke with reporters about NATO's efforts in Afghanistan, stressing the need for more help from the alliance's members, especially in the nonmilitary part of the equation. "For the entirety of my tour as the chairman, ... I've worked hard with my partners in NATO to push them to generate more capabilities, not just military capabilities," he said. "We have financial capabilities, we've got development capabilities. I talked about the need for governance. We have ... expertise that we need there to assist in training the Afghan people with the respect to proper governments. "There are a number of ways NATO members can help and we need them to step forward," he continued. "They have stepped forward to some degree. We need them to step forward more significantly." Mullen also discussed yesterday's vote by Kyrgyzstan's parliament to close Manas Air Base, an important logistical hub for the war in Afghanistan. While the country's parliament voted 79-1 not to renew the U.S. lease on the base, there has been no official notification from the Kyrgyz government, Mullen said. But if the base is closed, he added, the United States has options. "There's a six-month process once
notification is given, should that happen," Mullen said.
"We've done a lot of work to create options and look at
other ways of doing this, and I'm comfortable that those options
will support us very well if we get to that point." |
The latest Real Earnings news release Real average weekly earnings fell by 0.1
percent in January 2009. A 0.3 percent increase in average hourly
earnings was offset by a 0.3 percent increase in the Consumer
Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W).
Over the year real earnings increased 3.4 percent. |
US admits Afghan civilian deaths http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2009/02/200922115299177143.html |
Clinton cautions North Korea against
'provocative' Moves |
Clinton names special North Korea envoy Salon.com http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/us/2009/02/19/D96F23NO1_as_clinton_koreas/index.html |
Clinton sees recession ending in 2 years
or less http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D96ENFIO0.htm |
Clinton Speaks to Legislature |
Bill Clinton, Health Groups to Tackle
Childhood Obesity http://www.forbes.com/feeds/hscout/2009/02/19/hscout624320.html |
Clinton Warns of Possible North Korean
Succession Crisis |
Clinton: North Korea Engaging in 'War
of Words' With South Korea |
Consumer Price Index News Release The latest Consumer Price Index news release On a seasonally adjusted basis, the CPI-U
increased 0.3 |
Manas
Air Base Latest Kyrgyzstan's president has reportedly approved the closure of Manas Air Base, a key logistics hub for the U.S. military. |
President
Obama Canada Trip Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:52:18 -0600 President Barack Obama has returned from his first overseas trip as Commander in Chief. |
Freedom
Watch Afghanistan Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:44:07 -0600 The latest from Operation Enduring Freedom showing the activities of American troops in country. Produced by AFN-Afghanistan. |
NASA
Image of the Day: Friendship 7 Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:00:00 -0600 On Feb. 20, 1962 at 9:47 am EST, John Glenn launched from Cape Canaveral's Launch Complex 14 to become the first American to orbit the Earth. In this... |
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics: The
US, Northeast, and Boston is now available at Please refer questions to |
Business Opportunities for U.S. Army Environmental Command This information has recently been updated, and is now available. The Environmental Compliance Request for
Proposal (RFP) has been posted to the Army Single Face to Industry
(ASFI) Acquisition Business Web Site. A link can be found at
the USAEC Business Opportunities page under the News section.
|
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics: The Pacific Cities Consumer Price Index Summary (Pacific Cities Card) for January 2009
is now available Please refer questions to |
Miami Field Division for The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives news updates |
Osteoporosis page of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)
|
DOE Fossil Energy Funding Opportunity
Announcement The Department of Energy has issued a Funding |
Military Medical Digest for Military Health System This information has recently been updated,
and is now available.
|
Fraud Investment Banker Found in Virginia http://www.whsv.com/news/headlines/39902702.html |
U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) CDER New Drug Information and Approvals FDA issues Updated Safety Information about
Raptiva (efalizumab). Information
New and Generic Drug Approvals Heparin Sodium Injection,
Baxter Healthcare Corp., Labeling Revision |
new ticker page started 12:04 Eastern Time Saturday February 21, 2009 today's ticker page 5 for previous page click
here |
view previous page go to first page of the day |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
January |
|
|
|
|
|
|
February |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March |
|
|
|
|
| |
April |
|
|
|
|
| |
May |
|
|
|
|
| |
June |
|
|
|
|
| |
July |
|
|
|
|
| |
August |
|
|
|
|
| |
September |
|
|
|
|
| |
October |
|
|
|
|
| |
November |
|
|
|
|
| |
December |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|